W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > whatwg@whatwg.org > April 2013

Re: [whatwg] 2D canvas feature proposal: text decoration

From: Tab Atkins Jr. <jackalmage@gmail.com>
Date: Thu, 18 Apr 2013 13:48:54 -0700
Message-ID: <CAAWBYDA7hV13NiRFyx=8B-7QRC40uXh1RV4w6DD+RQxAaSz6tw@mail.gmail.com>
To: David Dailey <ddailey@zoominternet.net>
Cc: Justin Novosad <junov@google.com>, WHAT Working Group <whatwg@whatwg.org>
On Thu, Apr 18, 2013 at 1:37 PM, David Dailey <ddailey@zoominternet.net> wrote:
> You know, I'm not quite sure why we have text in canvas at all. It's not
> really text you know -- it's just a bunch of pixels. You can't select it,
> you can't copy it to the clipboard, it's not accessible without a bunch of
> effort that authors generally don't use. It's generally illegal in most
> civilized places. Why not use SVG? It's got text decoration. Text is text.
> It's just that the more conspiratorial and selfish of the browser vendors
> back when things were being voted on seemed to push canvas since they
> already owned it and SVG seemed "hard" and like they might have to learn
> something by way of graphics in their corporate portfolios.
> That's how I see it, anyhow. WHATWG doesn't vote, of course.

"text ... is generally illegal in most civilized places"

What is this i don't even

Received on Thursday, 18 April 2013 20:49:38 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Wednesday, 22 January 2020 16:59:57 UTC