- From: Tab Atkins Jr. <jackalmage@gmail.com>
- Date: Fri, 30 Nov 2012 10:28:46 -0800
- To: Anne van Kesteren <annevk@annevk.nl>
- Cc: WHATWG <whatwg@whatwg.org>
On Fri, Nov 30, 2012 at 9:47 AM, Anne van Kesteren <annevk@annevk.nl> wrote: > On Fri, Nov 30, 2012 at 6:42 PM, Tab Atkins Jr. <jackalmage@gmail.com> wrote: >> Only feedback left is the return types of set(), append(), and delete(). >> >> In Maps, set() returns the map, so you can chain more easily. TC39 >> hasn't yet made delete() return the map, but they plan to (baby steps, >> apparently, but us jumping on it will help). Obviously, append() >> should match set(). > > Right, once I have a definitive answer to > http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-script-coord/2012OctDec/0164.html > I will update a bunch of APIs to use chaining (assuming the answer is > that yes, this is the plan). I'm not really a fan of the style myself > so I'm not sure I want to be the one to push TC39 :-) Map#set returning the map is already in the draft, and there are no plans to change it. ~TJ
Received on Friday, 30 November 2012 20:12:45 UTC