- From: Ian Hickson <ian@hixie.ch>
- Date: Fri, 30 Nov 2012 00:06:29 +0000 (UTC)
- To: "Kang-Hao (Kenny) Lu" <kennyluck@csail.mit.edu>
- Cc: WHAT Working Group <whatwg@whatwg.org>, 张立理 <otakustay@gmail.com>
On Fri, 8 Jun 2012, Kang-Hao (Kenny) Lu wrote: > (12/06/08 7:28), Ian Hickson wrote: > > It still seems like a bit of an edge case, so I think it's ok for us > > to continue to rely on @import for this for now. But we should keep an > > eye out for how often people use this technique; if it is indeed > > something that comes up a lot, then introducing scoped="" on <link > > rel=stylesheet> would make sense. > > (12/03/03 2:03), Kang-Hao (Kenny) Lu wrote: > > A reader of html5doctor had the same problem too[1] and I can > > certainly image other people being confused by this. > > > > [1] http://html5doctor.com/the-scoped-attribute/#link > > which I mentioned, Googling the string "html5 scoped @import" gives me > the following sites which mention this technique, even if there's only > one browser supporting the 'scoped' attribute at the moment: [2][3][4] > > [2] http://www.codingforums.com/showthread.php?t=242411#postcount1154993 > [3] http://www.webdirections.org/blog/on-the-abominable-proposed-html5-scoped-attribute-for-style-elements/#comment-222761 > [4] http://www.peterrknight.com/loading-javascript-and-css-mid-page-html5-wordpress-passing-validation-part-1/ Yeah, that's fair enough. Righ now I can't find any browsers that implement <style scoped>. Unless <link scoped> is preferred by vendors than <style scoped>, I'd rather get one implemented and proven to work before we add more, so I still haven't added <link scoped>. To make sure I don't forget about this, though, I've filed it as a bug and will mark it LATER. https://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=20166 -- Ian Hickson U+1047E )\._.,--....,'``. fL http://ln.hixie.ch/ U+263A /, _.. \ _\ ;`._ ,. Things that are impossible just take longer. `._.-(,_..'--(,_..'`-.;.'
Received on Friday, 30 November 2012 00:36:09 UTC