- From: Anne van Kesteren <annevk@annevk.nl>
- Date: Thu, 29 Nov 2012 13:31:04 +0100
- To: Maciej Stachowiak <mjs@apple.com>
- Cc: whatwg@lists.whatwg.org, "Hallvord R. M. Steen" <hallvord@opera.com>, João Eiras <joaoe@opera.com>
On Sat, May 26, 2012 at 3:58 AM, Maciej Stachowiak <mjs@apple.com> wrote: > I don't think location.domain would be the same as location.tld, to the extent I understand the intent of them. > For the URL "http://www.apple.com/", "apple.com" would be the domain, and "com" would be the TLD. Yes, but for the URL "http://www.google.co.uk/" you would need to have publicsuffix.org information in order to determine that the effective domain is "google.co.uk" and not "co.uk". I'm not going to add this because cookies and document.domain are not good use cases for this. Cookies should eventually move to an origin-based security model (probably via some kind of opt-in) and document.domain should simply be avoided. (Ian asked me to reply to this thread https://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=20011 as the URL Standard now deals with these attributes.) -- http://annevankesteren.nl/
Received on Thursday, 29 November 2012 12:47:17 UTC