- From: Gordon P. Hemsley <gphemsley@gmail.com>
- Date: Tue, 27 Nov 2012 13:03:43 -0500
- To: Simon Pieters <simonp@opera.com>
- Cc: whatwg List <whatwg@whatwg.org>
Done: https://github.com/whatwg/mimesniff/commit/77ee676c8852f4e76facd7d6c1174ac0ec41696e Note that this also affects the "media type sniffing algorithm" and the "rules for identifying an unknown media type". On Tue, Nov 27, 2012 at 12:51 AM, Simon Pieters <simonp@opera.com> wrote: > On Mon, 26 Nov 2012 23:38:02 +0100, Gordon P. Hemsley <gphemsley@gmail.com> > wrote: > >> Upon looking through the code for Gecko's media sniffing, I noticed >> that they seem to combine sniffing for audio and video elements. Given >> that Opera has said that it uses the specific sniffing algorithms, and >> that some media containers (like Ogg) can be used for either audio or >> video, I wonder if it would make sense to combine audio and video >> sniffing under a single audiovisual category? This would affect the >> "matching audio/video type pattern" sections and the "sniffing >> audio/video specifically" sections. >> >> Any objections? Other thoughts? > > > Yes, I think it makes sense to have the same sniffing for both. <audio> is > like <video> without the rendering area. > > -- > Simon Pieters > Opera Software -- Gordon P. Hemsley me@gphemsley.org http://gphemsley.org/ • http://gphemsley.org/blog/
Received on Tuesday, 27 November 2012 18:11:54 UTC