- From: Julian Reschke <julian.reschke@gmx.de>
- Date: Mon, 19 Nov 2012 19:17:41 +0100
- To: Adam Barth <w3c@adambarth.com>
- Cc: whatwg List <whatwg@whatwg.org>, "Gordon P. Hemsley" <gphemsley@gmail.com>
On 2012-11-17 19:17, Adam Barth wrote: > ... > I would prefer if the spec described what implementations actually do > rather than your opinion about what they should do. To answer your > specific questions: > ... That works well if something is widely supported already. It works less well if you have one initial and one incomplete implementation only. > 1) Don't bother dropping the "X-". Everyone who implements this > feature uses the X- and dropping it is just going to cause unnecessary > interoperability problems. There's no *need* to drop it, but if research on this topic leads to the conclusion that the functionality is needed, but the current X- prototype isn't sufficient anyway it might be worth considering. > ... Best regards, Julian
Received on Monday, 19 November 2012 18:21:21 UTC