Re: [whatwg] [URL] DOM API Feedback

On Mon, Nov 19, 2012 at 5:38 AM, Boris Zbarsky <> wrote:
> On 11/19/12 2:36 AM, David Bruant wrote:
>>> I suppose the same goes for ES6 Map.
>> As Tab suggested, a Map subclass could certainly work
> How close are "subclasses" to not being vaporware (both in spec and
> implementation terms)?  Speccing things in terms of vaporware makes them
> pretty hard to implement in actual implementations...  Doesn't mean we
> shouldn't do it, but I'm a bit wary of it, in general.

Subclasses aren't anything new - we're just referring to the standard
prototype-based subclassing.


Received on Monday, 19 November 2012 18:00:57 UTC