- From: Ian Yang <ian@invigoreight.com>
- Date: Thu, 15 Nov 2012 19:27:31 +0800
- To: whatwg <whatwg@whatwg.org>
On Thu, Nov 15, 2012 at 12:59 PM, Tim Leverett <zzzzbov@gmail.com> wrote: > Personally, I'd rather see <main> be more about marking up content in > general, such as in this example which is invalid given the current state > of the spec: > <article id=1> > <header /> > <main /> > <footer /> > </article> > <article id=2> > <header /> > <main /> > <footer /> > </article> > > ...although this would probably fit better as a <content> element, and > would require a whole other line of discussion that can wait for another > day. > > ☺ > That's a good idea. We really need an element to wrap all the <p>s, <ul>s, <ol>s, <figure>s, <table>s ... etc of a blog post.
Received on Thursday, 15 November 2012 11:28:09 UTC