- From: Mounir Lamouri <mounir@lamouri.fr>
- Date: Wed, 14 Nov 2012 17:23:58 +0000
- To: whatwg@lists.whatwg.org
On 13/11/12 09:42, TAMURA, Kent wrote: > The current UI implementations of Opera, iOS, and Chrome-Android spoil the > HTML standard. Web authors hardly have motivation to use type=datetime. > They can add 'UTC' text, and their code can append 'Z' to values easily. > > I agree that the type names are not good. People must think type=datetime > is a combination of type=date and type=time. It's not too late to rename > datetime-local to datetime because the number of type=datetime or > type=datetime-local in the Web is terribly smaller than the number of > type=date. Tamura, do you think Webkit/Chrome can do this change? Gecko/Mozilla would be willing to implement 'datetime' that way and not implement 'datetime-local' but having other vendors committed to this change would be helpful and prevent us from going alone in this path. Cheers, -- Mounir
Received on Wednesday, 14 November 2012 17:59:55 UTC