- From: Boris Zbarsky <bzbarsky@MIT.EDU>
- Date: Mon, 12 Nov 2012 09:12:32 -0800
- To: Simon Pieters <simonp@opera.com>
- Cc: whatwg <whatwg@lists.whatwg.org>, Olli Pettay <opettay@mozilla.com>
On 11/12/12 5:45 AM, Simon Pieters wrote: > I don't see any attachment. Maybe the whatwg list prunes them? Can you > send it to www-archive? Gah. Here's the entire test case: <iframe></iframe> <script> window.onload = function() { window.onerror = function(msg, file, line) { alert('Parent handler: ' + msg + " " + file + " " + line); } frames[0].onerror = function(msg, file, line) { alert('Subframe handler: ' + msg + " " + file + " " + line); } frames[0].setTimeout(function() { throw "oops"; }, 100); } </script> > Do browsers use the script's origin per spec, or do they use the > function's global object's document's origin (for the purpose of > tainting the arguments)? This isn't even about origins and tainting so far; everything here is same-origin. It's purely about which onerror gets called. -Boris
Received on Monday, 12 November 2012 20:08:03 UTC