- From: Simon Pieters <simonp@opera.com>
- Date: Wed, 07 Nov 2012 12:51:17 +0100
- To: whatwg <whatwg@whatwg.org>, "Steve Faulkner" <faulkner.steve@gmail.com>
On Wed, 07 Nov 2012 12:46:36 +0100, Simon Pieters <simonp@opera.com> wrote: > On Wed, 07 Nov 2012 11:40:57 +0100, Steve Faulkner > <faulkner.steve@gmail.com> wrote: > >> Hi Anne, >> >> That feedback as stated was mainly for Hixie, who dismissed it. >> >> I have sought further opinion, but do not have the expertise to know >> what I >> need to do with it. >> >> for example, I get the sense that implementers in general do not want to >> mess with the parsing algorithm, so does that mean. I don't need to put >> anything in the spec? > > That's right. OTOH, if we wanted <main> to parse like <aside>, we'd add "main" to: [[ A start tag whose tag name is one of: "address", "article", "aside", "blockquote", "center", "details", "dialog", "dir", "div", "dl", "fieldset", "figcaption", "figure", "footer", "header", "hgroup", "menu", "nav", "ol", "p", "section", "summary", "ul" ]] and: [[ An end tag whose tag name is one of: "address", "article", "aside", "blockquote", "button", "center", "details", "dialog", "dir", "div", "dl", "fieldset", "figcaption", "figure", "footer", "header", "hgroup", "listing", "menu", "nav", "ol", "pre", "section", "summary", "ul" ]] in http://www.whatwg.org/specs/web-apps/current-work/multipage/tree-construction.html#parsing-main-inbody -- Simon Pieters Opera Software
Received on Wednesday, 7 November 2012 11:51:49 UTC