- From: Charles Pritchard <chuck@jumis.com>
- Date: Tue, 22 May 2012 15:11:23 -0700
- To: (wrong string) ¨˝ski <kornel@geekhood.net>
- Cc: whatwg@whatwg.org, "Tab Atkins Jr." <jackalmage@gmail.com>
On 5/22/2012 3:08 PM, Kornel Lesi¨˝ski wrote: > On 22 maj 2012, at 15:57, "Tab Atkins Jr." <jackalmage@gmail.com> wrote: > >> On Tue, May 22, 2012 at 7:26 AM, Kornel Lesi¨˝ski <kornel@geekhood.net> wrote: >>> I think that 3x device is very very unlikely to ever happen, since 2x screens are may be dense enough to have pixels smaller than human eye can see. >> Tell that to printers, which can easily hit 400+dpi. You need more >> than 2x before you make anti-aliasing fully unnecessary. > Is making AA unnecessary a goal though? > > It seems to me that antialiasing isn't a complex or computationally expensive problem any more. > 3x may happen with browser zoom on desktop and on mobile -- Chrome goes to 500%. -Charles
Received on Tuesday, 22 May 2012 22:12:13 UTC