Re: [whatwg] responsive images

On 5/22/2012 3:08 PM, Kornel Lesi¨˝ski wrote:
> On 22 maj 2012, at 15:57, "Tab Atkins Jr." <jackalmage@gmail.com> wrote:
>
>> On Tue, May 22, 2012 at 7:26 AM, Kornel Lesi¨˝ski <kornel@geekhood.net> wrote:
>>> I think that 3x device is very very unlikely to ever happen, since 2x screens are may be dense enough to have pixels smaller than human eye can see.
>> Tell that to printers, which can easily hit 400+dpi.  You need more
>> than 2x before you make anti-aliasing fully unnecessary.
> Is making AA unnecessary a goal though?
>
> It seems to me that antialiasing isn't a complex or computationally expensive problem any more.
>

3x may happen with browser zoom on desktop and on mobile -- Chrome goes
to 500%.


-Charles

Received on Tuesday, 22 May 2012 22:12:13 UTC