- From: Matthew Wilcox <mail@matthewwilcox.com>
- Date: Thu, 17 May 2012 14:22:42 +0100
- To: Kornel LesiĆski <kornel@geekhood.net>
- Cc: whatwg@lists.whatwg.org
Cheers for that feedback Andy - it is indeed a complicated issue with much more nuance than I think many people (myself included) would have expected. I still think there's a technical solution there, but as you say - it's making that solution reliable enough to be worth it. The problem really is "what is reliable enough"? How accurate does it need to be. I can understand that this is in practical terms too complex an issue to be worth the effort required to get something workable. And the logic isn't simple either. That said, it's only a matter of making a decision about what to do. The actual mechanics shouldn't be hard, it's the decision making that is.
Received on Thursday, 17 May 2012 13:23:23 UTC