- From: Kornel Lesiński <kornel@geekhood.net>
- Date: Thu, 17 May 2012 12:27:14 +0100
- To: whatwg@lists.whatwg.org
On Wed, 16 May 2012 19:48:04 +0100, Matthew Wilcox <mail@matthewwilcox.com> wrote: > First off I know that a number of people say this is not possible. I > am not wanting to argue this because I don't have the knowledge to > argue it - but I do want to understand why, and currently I do not. > Please also remember that I can only see this from an authors > perspective as I'm ignorant of the mechanics of how these things work > internally. > > The idea is to have something like: > > <link media="min-bandwidth:0.5mps" ... /> > <link media="min-bandwidth:1mps" ... /> > <link media="min-bandwidth:8mps" ... /> > > This make an obvious kind of sense to an author. What would happen in this scenario: I'm in a cafe with free WiFi browsing on my phone, I have 8mbps bandwidth. I open the page and read it (it could be a webapp or a long article that stays open for a long time). I leave the cafe, my bandwidth drops to 1mbps, but I still have the same page open. Should the design change? Should the browser throw away all high-res images it has downloaded and re-download them in poor quality? What when I reload or browse to a next subpage? My browser still has high-res images in the cache. Should it now apply low-end design and re-download all images in poor quality? -- regards, Kornel
Received on Thursday, 17 May 2012 11:27:53 UTC