- From: Maciej Stachowiak <mjs@apple.com>
- Date: Thu, 10 May 2012 13:15:48 -0700
- To: "Tab Atkins Jr." <jackalmage@gmail.com>
- Cc: whatwg@whatwg.org, Edward O'Connor <eoconnor@apple.com>
On May 10, 2012, at 6:24 AM, Tab Atkins Jr. <jackalmage@gmail.com> wrote: > > > That all said, I don't like the "2x" notation. It's declaring "this > image's resolution is twice that of a normal image". This has two > problems. For one, we already have a unit that means that - the dppx > unit. Using "2dppx" is identical to the meaning of "2x". Since > image-set() is newer than the dppx unit, we should change it to use > <resolution> instead. "dppx" has the downside that not even CSS Working Group members can consistently spell it correctly. Regards, Maciej
Received on Thursday, 10 May 2012 20:16:57 UTC