- From: Adam Barth <w3c@adambarth.com>
- Date: Mon, 26 Mar 2012 15:22:33 -0700
On Mon, Mar 26, 2012 at 3:17 PM, Ian Hickson <ian at hixie.ch> wrote: > On Mon, 26 Mar 2012, Adam Barth wrote: >> >> WebKit recently implemented >> http://www.whatwg.org/specs/web-apps/current-work/#attr-translate, but >> that caused us to break orange.fr on mobile: >> >> https://bugs.webkit.org/show_bug.cgi?id=82246 >> >> The problem is that >> http://www.winktoolkit.org/documentation/symbols/HTMLElement.html#translate >> has a the following code: >> >> if (wink.isUndefined(HTMLElement.prototype.translate)) >> ? ? HTMLElement.prototype.translate = HTMLElement.prototype.winkTranslate; >> >> The web site expects HTMLElement.prototype.translate to be Wink's >> translate function rather than the HTML translate attribute. >> >> Would it make sense to change the name of the translate attribute to >> avoid this conflict? ?Should we try to evangalize the Wink Toolkit to >> change their code and everyone who uses Wink to update to the fixed >> version? > > How widely used is it? (In particular, how widely used is .translate() > rather than .winkTranslate()?) The documentation lists only .translate(), not .winkTranslate(), so I would expect most folks using the library to use the former rather than the latter. Adam > I don't mind changing the name, but it's unclear that there's a better > name out there. It would be unfortunate to have to reserve the use of a > name as generic as "translate" for a particular library. > > In any case we should definitely ask Wink to avoid unprefixed names. > That's asking for trouble. > > -- > Ian Hickson ? ? ? ? ? ? ? U+1047E ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ?)\._.,--....,'``. ? ?fL > http://ln.hixie.ch/ ? ? ? U+263A ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ?/, ? _.. \ ? _\ ?;`._ ,. > Things that are impossible just take longer. ? `._.-(,_..'--(,_..'`-.;.'
Received on Monday, 26 March 2012 15:22:33 UTC