- From: Jukka K. Korpela <jkorpela@cs.tut.fi>
- Date: Wed, 22 Feb 2012 20:01:58 +0200
2012-02-22 19:30, Cameron Jones wrote: > Updating<output> as form submittable element is included in a > proposal to enhance http request processing under a w3c issue This sounds like a pointless attempt at enhancing a pointless element. Instead of <output>, authors can use, and have been able to use since rather early days, <input> if the data is to be submitted as part of form data, and any non-form-field element, like <div>, otherwise. (Well, in the very early days, it had to be <input> anyway, but that was long ago.) <output> is just for looking semantic for semantics' sake. There is nothing illogical in using <input> for data that is generated (not directly user-supplied) client-side. It's input to form handlers, client-side or server-side, anyway. And there's nothing particularly semantic (i.e., as relating to meaning) about saying that some content is the output of some calculation. If a value is 42, its being in <output> does not indicate its meaning in any way. <output> has _some_ effects: it confuses authors, if they wish to be serious about new specifications. So please drop <output>. Yucca
Received on Wednesday, 22 February 2012 10:01:58 UTC