- From: Bjartur Thorlacius <svartman95@gmail.com>
- Date: Tue, 21 Feb 2012 19:31:22 +0000
?ann ?ri 21.feb 2012 18:44, skrifa?i James Hawkins: > I'm not sure if the proposal was explicit enough, but for the RPH-esque > functionality in Web Intents, we activate WI in the same circumstances > RPH is activated, which is when links are activated in a page. Can you > elucidate how the scenarios you listed could be handled? Note these > scenarios are above and beyond RPH, but we're not trying to make the API > self-limiting. Windows Explorer (the file manager) does for example offer users to edit images upon right-click. I worry that if URI scheme handlers need not only take care of fetching but also of presentation, other actions than view will be unnecessarily hard to implement. Thus I figure retrieval and presentation must be separated. (view (fetch uniform:resource/locator)) or (edit (fetch uniform:resource/locator)) instead of (fetch-and-view uniform:resource/locator)
Received on Tuesday, 21 February 2012 11:31:22 UTC