- From: Smylers <Smylers@stripey.com>
- Date: Sun, 12 Feb 2012 07:52:42 +0000
Ian Hickson writes: > On Thu, 14 Jul 2011, Kevin Marks wrote: > > > There is another common pattern, seen in blogging a lot, of putting > > the citation at the top eg > > As <cite class="vcard"><a href="http://www.gyford.com/phil/" > > class="url" rel="acquaintance met colleague"><abbr title="Phil Gyford" > > class="fn">Phil</abbr></a></cite> wrote about the <a > > href="http://www.gyford.com/phil/writing/2009/04/28/geocities.php">ugly > > and neglected fragments</a> of Geocities:</p> > > > > <blockquote> > > <p>GeoCities is an awful, ugly, decrepit mess. And this is why it > > will be sorely missed. It?s not only a fine example of the amateur web > > vernacular but much of it is an increasingly rare example of a > > <em>period</em> web vernacular. GeoCities sites show what normal, > > non-designer, people will create if given the tools available around > > the turn of the millennium.</p> > > </blockquote> > > ... the current markup handles it fine already (as you demonstrate > above). Using <cite> like that isn't conforming, surely? Smylers
Received on Saturday, 11 February 2012 23:52:42 UTC