- From: Tab Atkins Jr. <jackalmage@gmail.com>
- Date: Tue, 1 Mar 2011 11:25:11 -0800
On Tue, Mar 1, 2011 at 10:54 AM, usuario <soyhobo at gmail.com> wrote: > According to the spec: > The body element represents the body of a document (as opposed to the > document?s metadata). > > I think definition is a bit ambiguous. > > We may think in giving it a more explicit meaning, and freeing it for > semantic availability (just an example): > > <!DOCTYPE html> > <html> > ? ?<head> <!--<metadata>, <system>, <config> --> > ? ? ? ?<meta></meta> > ? ? ? ?<script></script> > ? ? ? ?<link></link> > ? ?</head> > ? ?<markup> <!-- <window>, <render>, <main>, <app>, <structure> --> > ? ? ? ?<header> > ? ? ? ? ? ?<h1></h1> > ? ? ? ? ? ?<p></p> > ? ? ? ?</header> > ? ? ? ?<body> > ? ? ? ? ? ?<p></p> > ? ? ? ? ? ?<p></p> > ? ? ? ?</body> > ? ? ? ?<footer> > ? ? ? ? ? ?<p></p> > ? ? ? ?</footer> > ? ?</markup> > </html> I don't understand what problem you're trying to solve, nor what your proposal is. Are you proposing to rename <body>? If so, there are significant legacy constraints preventing that (namely, a lot of code depends on a missing <body> tag being inferred). ~TJ
Received on Tuesday, 1 March 2011 11:25:11 UTC