- From: Mounir Lamouri <mounir.lamouri@gmail.com>
- Date: Wed, 05 Jan 2011 11:15:36 +0100
On 01/05/2011 02:29 AM, Ian Hickson wrote: > On Thu, 14 Oct 2010, Olli Pettay wrote: >> >> may I wonder why on earth any new API, like >> link.sizes uses PutForwards? >> IMHO, PutForwards should be limited to the >> awkward DOM0 APIs like window.location. > > On Fri, 15 Oct 2010, Olli Pettay wrote: >> >> It makes getters and setters work in a very different way. >> Inconsistency in APIs isn't a good thing. > > I don't understand how they work in a different way? > > The idea is to make the attribute appear to work like a DOMString for most > purposes, but to allow methods to be invoked on it. (All the attributes > that have [PutForwards] set also have a stringifier on their object's > interface.) Is there a use case for [PutForwards] (except saving a few characters for the authors) that could justify the inconsistency? -- Mounir
Received on Wednesday, 5 January 2011 02:15:36 UTC