- From: Robert O'Callahan <robert@ocallahan.org>
- Date: Fri, 21 May 2010 09:47:01 +1200
On Fri, May 21, 2010 at 2:00 AM, Boris Zbarsky <bzbarsky at mit.edu> wrote: > On 5/20/10 5:59 AM, Robert O'Callahan wrote: > >> Hmm. I guess it doesn't add any implementation requirements beyond what >> you need to handle the complete absence of a Content-Type (which we >> currently don't handle, but I suppose we should). >> > > For what it's worth, the above-necko layer in Gecko never sees "absence of > a Content-Type". If there isn't one, necko will sniff, period. Of course > that sniffing knows nothing about video at the moment, and will likely just > detect it as application/octet-stream (modulo the extension-sniffing bits). > Ah, right. Thanks. Rob -- "He was pierced for our transgressions, he was crushed for our iniquities; the punishment that brought us peace was upon him, and by his wounds we are healed. We all, like sheep, have gone astray, each of us has turned to his own way; and the LORD has laid on him the iniquity of us all." [Isaiah 53:5-6] -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: <http://lists.whatwg.org/pipermail/whatwg-whatwg.org/attachments/20100521/93f47076/attachment.htm>
Received on Thursday, 20 May 2010 14:47:01 UTC