- From: Boris Zbarsky <bzbarsky@MIT.EDU>
- Date: Thu, 20 May 2010 10:00:48 -0400
On 5/20/10 5:59 AM, Robert O'Callahan wrote: > Hmm. I guess it doesn't add any implementation requirements beyond what > you need to handle the complete absence of a Content-Type (which we > currently don't handle, but I suppose we should). For what it's worth, the above-necko layer in Gecko never sees "absence of a Content-Type". If there isn't one, necko will sniff, period. Of course that sniffing knows nothing about video at the moment, and will likely just detect it as application/octet-stream (modulo the extension-sniffing bits). -Boris
Received on Thursday, 20 May 2010 07:00:48 UTC