W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > whatwg@whatwg.org > June 2010

[whatwg] Do we really need a <device> element?

From: Bjartur Thorlacius <svartman95@gmail.com>
Date: Sun, 13 Jun 2010 14:00:30 +0000
Message-ID: <AANLkTikaWgMwp4sUX8_vGU3UzD5gNFVZninCwdw8TPZl@mail.gmail.com>
On 6/12/10, James Salsman <jsalsman at gmail.com> wrote:
> Bjartur, real-time streaming audio uploads enable pronunciation assessment
> for language instruction during multiplayer online roleplaying games such as
> those by http://www.8dworld.com
>
> input type=file accept="audio/x-speex;quality=(0-10);bitrate=..." is more
> important, and accept="audio/ogg video/x-webm, video/ogg" are all fairly
> important, too.
>
> On Jun 12, 2010 11:15 AM, "Bjartur Thorlacius" <svartman95 at gmail.com> wrote:
>
> What is the use case for <device>?
> I?ve searched the archives, read a thread, Googled around and read a
> document on the subject, but still I haven?t found a use case for it
> other than it is going to magically increase user privacy.
>
> <input type=file accept="audio/*"> is a standard and compatible way to
> request audio stream(s). I can?t see any drawbacks to using <input>
> for audiovisual streams at least.
>
> --
> kv,
>   - Bjartur
>


-- 
kv,
  - Bjartur
Received on Sunday, 13 June 2010 07:00:30 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Wednesday, 22 January 2020 16:59:24 UTC