- From: Ashley Sheridan <ash@ashleysheridan.co.uk>
- Date: Thu, 08 Jul 2010 18:23:23 +0100
On Thu, 2010-07-08 at 19:18 +0200, Diego Perini wrote: > > > > On Thu, Jul 8, 2010 at 4:03 PM, Lachlan Hunt > <lachlan.hunt at lachy.id.au> wrote: > > On 2010-07-08 02:28, Garrett Smith wrote: > > This is about the fourth time I've said it here. Can > the person in > charge of writing the slow and buggy ajvascript on the > HTML 5 spec > please remove that? > > > The problem is that that whatwg page causes freezes > and crashes in Firefox. i > > > As a workaround, you can use AdBlock in Firefox to block the > offending script. Just manually add this URL to your block > list. > > http://www.whatwg.org/specs/web-apps/current-work/status.js > > -- > Lachlan Hunt - Opera Software > http://lachy.id.au/ > http://www.opera.com/ > > > The problem is not only with Firefox and it happens I am not only > using Firefox. > > Is there a similar blocking feature of Opera that you can suggest ? > > Also in Opera: > > Uncaught exception: Reference Error: Undefined variable: > fixBrokenLink > Error thrown at line 39, column 5 in init() in > http://dev.w3.org/html5/spec/Overview.html: fixBrokenLink(); > called from line 1, column 0 in <anonymous function>(event): init() > > I haven't reviewed the complete script itself but I have some thoughts > about this (comparing behaviour on different browsers). > > I suspect that when the above is fixed it will take more time in Opera > and other browsers throwing errors and (maybe) suspending execution. > As a side note, should the browser completely suspend script execution > when an event handler fails ? > > Isn't the error thrown in a different execution context when handling > event listeners ? > > I believe the main execution context should not be suppressed, > especially for an undeclared variable in a different context. > > Diego Perini > Someone earlier mentioned the http://www.whatwg.org/specs/web-apps/current-work/?slow-browser URL. Would it not be sensible to maybe make that the default behaviour, and then use a special ?crash-test type URL as the -one that crashes the browsers- stress test? That way, you'd still have the test if people wanted it, and those that don't won't get unexpected behaviour. Or maybe I'm misunderstanding the problem? Thanks, Ash http://www.ashleysheridan.co.uk -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: <http://lists.whatwg.org/pipermail/whatwg-whatwg.org/attachments/20100708/03ca30cd/attachment.htm>
Received on Thursday, 8 July 2010 10:23:23 UTC