- From: Michael A. Puls II <shadow2531@gmail.com>
- Date: Tue, 26 Jan 2010 04:45:49 -0500
On Mon, 25 Jan 2010 20:36:27 -0500, Ian Hickson <ian at hixie.ch> wrote: > On Thu, 10 Dec 2009, Michael A. Puls II wrote: >> > > >> > > Also see <https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=90268#c68>. >> > > Should probably add a note in the spec that the css overflow and >> > > position properties don't affect instantiation/destroying etc. >> > > (might as well add visibility too). And, after that, it'd probably >> > > be best to note that css in general doesn't affect >> > > instantiation/destroying (to avoid having to keep on adding CSS >> > > properties to the list) >> > > >> > > Something like this: >> > > >> > > Note: The above algorithm is independent of CSS. For example, it >> > > runs even if the element is hidden or out-of-view because of the >> > > 'display', 'position', 'visibility' and 'overflow' properties. >> > > >> > > Further, changing the value of any CSS property does not cause the >> > > above algorithm to run again on the element. For example, changing >> > > the element's 'display' property from 'inline-block' to 'none' does >> > > not destroy the loaded resource. >> > >> > Fair enough. Done something like the above. >> >> That'll work. Could you make the change for <embed> and <applet> too >> when you have time? > > It appears I have already done so. Thanks. Please see the note in the <object> element section. It has more detailed info. The embed and applet elements have the old, less-detailed note. -- Michael
Received on Tuesday, 26 January 2010 01:45:49 UTC