- From: Ian Hickson <ian@hixie.ch>
- Date: Tue, 26 Jan 2010 01:36:27 +0000 (UTC)
On Thu, 10 Dec 2009, Michael A. Puls II wrote: > > > > > > Also see <https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=90268#c68>. > > > Should probably add a note in the spec that the css overflow and > > > position properties don't affect instantiation/destroying etc. > > > (might as well add visibility too). And, after that, it'd probably > > > be best to note that css in general doesn't affect > > > instantiation/destroying (to avoid having to keep on adding CSS > > > properties to the list) > > > > > > Something like this: > > > > > > Note: The above algorithm is independent of CSS. For example, it > > > runs even if the element is hidden or out-of-view because of the > > > 'display', 'position', 'visibility' and 'overflow' properties. > > > > > > Further, changing the value of any CSS property does not cause the > > > above algorithm to run again on the element. For example, changing > > > the element's 'display' property from 'inline-block' to 'none' does > > > not destroy the loaded resource. > > > > Fair enough. Done something like the above. > > That'll work. Could you make the change for <embed> and <applet> too > when you have time? It appears I have already done so. Cheers, -- Ian Hickson U+1047E )\._.,--....,'``. fL http://ln.hixie.ch/ U+263A /, _.. \ _\ ;`._ ,. Things that are impossible just take longer. `._.-(,_..'--(,_..'`-.;.'
Received on Monday, 25 January 2010 17:36:27 UTC