- From: Silvia Pfeiffer <silviapfeiffer1@gmail.com>
- Date: Thu, 26 Aug 2010 23:52:06 +1000
On Thu, Aug 26, 2010 at 9:01 PM, Tab Atkins Jr. <jackalmage at gmail.com>wrote: > On Wed, Aug 25, 2010 at 7:00 PM, Silvia Pfeiffer > <silviapfeiffer1 at gmail.com> wrote: > > It would, however, be good to have an indication where HTML would like to > > see it going. Would it be better for a media fragment URI for images such > as > > http://example.com/picture.png#xywh=160,120,320,240 to display the full > > image with the rectangle somehow highlighted (as is the case with > fragment > > URIs to HTML pages), or would it be better to actually just display the > > specified region and hide the rest of the image (i.e. create a sprite)? > What > > makes the most sense for images? > > The CSS Image Values Module ( http://dev.w3.org/csswg/css3-images/#url > ) is currently recommending Media Fragments as a way to sprite out a > portion of a resource. We have a note that we're expecting a spec to > reference at some point. > > ~TJ > Oh, wow, that's good to know. Thanks! Silvia. -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: <http://lists.whatwg.org/pipermail/whatwg-whatwg.org/attachments/20100826/8ad06edd/attachment.htm>
Received on Thursday, 26 August 2010 06:52:06 UTC