- From: Tab Atkins Jr. <jackalmage@gmail.com>
- Date: Thu, 26 Aug 2010 04:01:56 -0700
On Wed, Aug 25, 2010 at 7:00 PM, Silvia Pfeiffer <silviapfeiffer1 at gmail.com> wrote: > It would, however, be good to have an indication where HTML would like to > see it going. Would it be better for a media fragment URI for images such as > http://example.com/picture.png#xywh=160,120,320,240? to display the full > image with the rectangle somehow highlighted (as is the case with fragment > URIs to HTML pages), or would it be better to actually just display the > specified region and hide the rest of the image (i.e. create a sprite)? What > makes the most sense for images? The CSS Image Values Module ( http://dev.w3.org/csswg/css3-images/#url ) is currently recommending Media Fragments as a way to sprite out a portion of a resource. We have a note that we're expecting a spec to reference at some point. ~TJ
Received on Thursday, 26 August 2010 04:01:56 UTC