- From: Robert O'Callahan <robert@ocallahan.org>
- Date: Mon, 23 Aug 2010 15:00:09 +1200
On Sun, Aug 22, 2010 at 4:12 AM, Adam Barth <w3c at adambarth.com> wrote: > On Sat, Aug 21, 2010 at 2:00 AM, Robert O'Callahan <robert at ocallahan.org> > wrote: > > On Sat, Aug 21, 2010 at 5:21 PM, Adam Barth <w3c at adambarth.com> wrote: > >> How is going fullscreen different from opening a popup window? > > > > That depends on how the UA chooses to handle it. But this proposed > > fullscreen API is based on the idea that the fullscreen content "takes > over" > > the toplevel browsing context to which it belongs. (The content is styled > to > > fill the IFRAME, and the IFRAME element is styled to fill the parent > > document's viewport.) > > That does seem dangerous if the location bar still displays the URL of > the top-level browsing context because it violates the constraint > principle of display delegation. > That's why I want to default to prohibiting subframe content from going fullscreen. This doesn't seem like a good model for full-screen. I would think > the model of re-parenting the content to a popup window that fills the > entire screen would be a better model. > I think that model is a lot harder to spec and a lot harder for Web authors to understand. I'd certainly be interested in looking at a proposal if someone wants to pursue that approach. Rob -- "Now the Bereans were of more noble character than the Thessalonians, for they received the message with great eagerness and examined the Scriptures every day to see if what Paul said was true." [Acts 17:11] -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: <http://lists.whatwg.org/pipermail/whatwg-whatwg.org/attachments/20100823/791045cf/attachment.htm>
Received on Sunday, 22 August 2010 20:00:09 UTC