- From: Ian Hickson <ian@hixie.ch>
- Date: Mon, 9 Aug 2010 19:11:10 +0000 (UTC)
On Fri, 11 Jun 2010, Tab Atkins Jr. wrote: > > 1. The HTML algo puts the url for atom:link elements in the content of > the <link>. It should be in the @href of the <link>. Fixed. > 3. The HTML algo sets the @type attribute on atom:content to "xml" in > some circumstances. It should be "xhtml". Fixed. > 4. The HTML algo should include an <xml:base> element in the produced > feed so that relative links work correctly. Done. (Note: there's no such thing as an xml:base element, it's an attribute.) > 5. I'm not 100% certain on this one, but I think that, in the current > step 15.8 of the HTML algo, it should produce a <div> element in the > XHTML namespace. As far as I can tell, it does. > The algo currently doesn't specify a namespace for the element. Which element? On Fri, 11 Jun 2010, Edward O'Connor wrote: > > > > 2. The <title> of atom entries is constrained to contain text only, > > That's not quite right. <atom:title> is an Atom Text Construct, which, > despite having the word 'text' in its name, can contain all sorts of > things. <atom:title> is the same as <atom:summary>, <atom:content>, and > <atom:rights>, so the algo should handle it in the same way as it does > <atom:content>. Fixed, I think. -- Ian Hickson U+1047E )\._.,--....,'``. fL http://ln.hixie.ch/ U+263A /, _.. \ _\ ;`._ ,. Things that are impossible just take longer. `._.-(,_..'--(,_..'`-.;.'
Received on Monday, 9 August 2010 12:11:10 UTC