- From: Jon Barnett <jonbarnett@gmail.com>
- Date: Mon, 9 Aug 2010 13:42:29 -0500
I just read Hixie's message here: http://lists.whatwg.org/htdig.cgi/whatwg-whatwg.org/2008-November/017583.html <http://lists.whatwg.org/htdig.cgi/whatwg-whatwg.org/2008-November/017583.html>While I understand the reasoning for not implementing a bunch of new attributes and functionality, I would still like to see <select required> even without the other suggestions as requiring at least one option element to be successful with a non-empty value. I was beginning to write a <form> for a site and I thought I'd go ahead and use <input required> and <textarea required> with some css: [required] ~ label:after { content: '*' } ... and possibly javascript to read that attribute, etc. But since I can't implement that on my <select> elements and still validate, I plan to skip the required attribute entirely and use class names instead for now so that all the form elements are consistent. -- Jon Barnett -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: <http://lists.whatwg.org/pipermail/whatwg-whatwg.org/attachments/20100809/7396d3f7/attachment.htm>
Received on Monday, 9 August 2010 11:42:29 UTC