- From: Philip Jägenstedt <philipj@opera.com>
- Date: Wed, 04 Aug 2010 12:56:30 +0200
On Wed, 04 Aug 2010 11:32:51 +0200, Boris Zbarsky <bzbarsky at mit.edu> wrote: > On 8/4/10 4:29 AM, Philip J?genstedt wrote: >> That could be, but is this behavior actually useful for anything? It's >> certainly simpler to implement and more predictable for authors to >> always wait until the current script has finished executing. > > 1) That requires defining "current script". OK, but that's just a spec problem. It's trivial in implementation because when the resource selection algorithm was is triggered by a script, you can just pass along a reference to that very script. > 2) Who said it will ever finish executing? If it doesn't, just don't ever continue with the synchronous section. Is there any valid case for a script never finishing? It would block all event handlers from running too, so in any case it's a broken page. -- Philip J?genstedt Core Developer Opera Software
Received on Wednesday, 4 August 2010 03:56:30 UTC