- From: Boris Zbarsky <bzbarsky@MIT.EDU>
- Date: Wed, 04 Aug 2010 05:32:51 -0400
On 8/4/10 4:29 AM, Philip J?genstedt wrote: > That could be, but is this behavior actually useful for anything? It's > certainly simpler to implement and more predictable for authors to > always wait until the current script has finished executing. 1) That requires defining "current script". 2) Who said it will ever finish executing? -Boris
Received on Wednesday, 4 August 2010 02:32:51 UTC