- From: Ian Hickson <ian@hixie.ch>
- Date: Wed, 16 Sep 2009 08:12:49 +0000 (UTC)
On Tue, 15 Sep 2009, Smylers wrote: > > whatwg at whatwg.org writes: > > > + <p>The <span class=impl>first</span> <code><a href=#the-dt-element>dt</a></code> element child > > + of the element, if any, represents the caption of the > > + <code><a href=#the-figure-element>figure</a></code> element's contents. If there is no child > > + <code><a href=#the-dt-element>dt</a></code> element, then there is no caption.</p> > > > > + <p>The <span class=impl>first</span> <code><a href=#the-dd-element>dd</a></code> element child > > + of the element<span class=impl>, if any,</span> represents the > > + element's contents. <span class=impl>If there is no child > > + <code><a href=#the-dd-element>dd</a></code> element, then there is no caption.</span></p> > > I think that last "caption" is supposed to be "content". Fixed. > Also, the "If there is no" for <dd> is class=impl but the equivalent one > for <dt> isn't. Yeah, the <dt> is optional, so that case is relevant to authors. > While proofreading this change I also spotted an inconsistency in the > related example undet the <dd> element: > > http://www.whatwg.org/html5#the-dd-element > > I think the first class=part-of-speech should be on the <i> rather than > the <dd> (matching the other instances). That was intentional; the thinking was that when styling you'd want to know when the whole <dd> was used for the part of speech or whether the <dd> had a part of speech and a definition. -- Ian Hickson U+1047E )\._.,--....,'``. fL http://ln.hixie.ch/ U+263A /, _.. \ _\ ;`._ ,. Things that are impossible just take longer. `._.-(,_..'--(,_..'`-.;.'
Received on Wednesday, 16 September 2009 01:12:49 UTC