- From: Francisco Tolmasky <francisco@280north.com>
- Date: Wed, 16 Sep 2009 01:23:39 -0700
> Yes, that is a neat solution. However, it is still the case that at > this > time we should not add new features, otherwise we might get too far > ahead > of the implementations, and the quality of implementations will go > down. Since I am new to the list I'm not sure how to interpret the context of this type of answer: in other words, does this mean "wait until next month" or "wait until HTML 6". Similarly, if it was determined that a sufficient number of browsers implemented this existing feature to a satisfactory degree, would that itself be enough to request this addition again? As you stated, both IE and Safari have this thing pretty nailed down for quite a while now already. Firefox has done a considerable amount of work to implement this as well and at the very least advertises it as a "complete" feature. Is there some way to measure the quality of implementations? > Decisions are made based on their technical merits, it doesn't > matter how > many people support it. :-) Also being new to the list I feel compelled to ask whether this is some sort of meme or inside joke as I have seen it more than once and is clearly self-contradictory. Thanks, Francisco
Received on Wednesday, 16 September 2009 01:23:39 UTC