W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > whatwg@whatwg.org > June 2009

[whatwg] H.264-in-<video> vs plugin APIs

From: David Gerard <dgerard@gmail.com>
Date: Sun, 14 Jun 2009 13:21:55 +0100
Message-ID: <fbad4e140906140521k7e6586e6nd85b99cbe80f4bdc@mail.gmail.com>
2009/6/14 Chris DiBona <cdibona at gmail.com>:

> I'll pass this on, it's a good post. Have you considered other kinds
> of video tests as well? (something cell shaded, more movement/action,
> etc...) as it stands, it's useful, with more examples, it might be
> more convincing as an argument for Theora.


An important thing will be for you to internally speak up against such
vast misconceptions as you voiced in your original posting whenever
they spring up. H.264 just isn't so vastly superior and Theora just
isn't so vastly awful, and Google is the content king in this area.


- d.
Received on Sunday, 14 June 2009 05:21:55 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Wednesday, 22 January 2020 16:59:13 UTC