- From: Peter Mika <pmika@yahoo-inc.com>
- Date: Fri, 24 Jul 2009 15:40:30 +0200
Fair point. Just brainstorming here: how about making about an attribute? <div item id="amanda" about="http://...."></div> <p>Name: <span subject="amanda" itemprop="name">Amanda</span></p> We still have two identifiers, but at least giving the URI is simplified. Best, Peter Julian Reschke wrote: > Peter Mika wrote: >> Hi All, >> >> I've been taking a closer look at microdata. While I like the >> proposal in general, in particular the chance to unite microformat >> style annotations with some of the Semantic Web formalism (such as >> URIs for objects), there are still a number of points that I feel >> could be improved. So here are my proposals for discussion: >> >> #1 >> >> The use of a URI as the value of the id attribute. It seems to me >> there is actually nothing in the spec that would stop this: >> ... > > IDs like that would be very hard to use as fragment identifier... > > > ... > > BR, Julian
Received on Friday, 24 July 2009 06:40:30 UTC