- From: Ian Hickson <ian@hixie.ch>
- Date: Mon, 6 Jul 2009 23:39:58 +0000 (UTC)
On Tue, 7 Jul 2009, Hans Schmucker wrote: > > About interoperability: At least for me Canvas support seems very stable > across browsers, which is why I'm comfortable asking for the next step, > as long as including it doesn't change compatibility with existing JS > code and wouldn't require needlessly complicated fallbacks. Both > fallbacks and support would be pretty straight-forward for this. This is about more than just <canvas>; if we add more canvas features now, it takes resources away from other features in the spec. (Also, <canvas> isn't _that_ well supported yet; there are many edge cases where support is somewhat flaky.) -- Ian Hickson U+1047E )\._.,--....,'``. fL http://ln.hixie.ch/ U+263A /, _.. \ _\ ;`._ ,. Things that are impossible just take longer. `._.-(,_..'--(,_..'`-.;.'
Received on Monday, 6 July 2009 16:39:58 UTC