- From: James May <whatwg@fowlsmurf.net>
- Date: Wed, 16 Dec 2009 00:16:09 +1300
If this change is made, what is the correct (explicit) way to refer to the current URL? "." ? In terms of web compat, I do recall a web picture gallery package that returned a html information page with a self reference to show the actual image. -- James 2009/12/15 Maciej Stachowiak <mjs at apple.com> > > On Dec 14, 2009, at 11:08 AM, Nicholas Zakas wrote: > > It seems that thusfar, Jonas from Mozilla is open to this change. Is >> there anyone from Opera or WebKit that would like to chime in either in >> favor or opposition? >> > > I'd love to issue fewer useless loads, if sites don't actually rely on it. > > Does anyone have data on what, if any, compatibility impact this has? I > can't imagine loading the base URL to be terribly useful in most cases, but > perhaps there are wacky sites that do indeed rely on it. > > Regards, > Maciej > > > > > >> Thanks. >> >> -Nicholas >> >> ______________________________________________ >> Commander Lock: "Damnit Morpheus, not everyone believes what you >> believe!" >> Morpheus: "My beliefs do not require them to." >> >> -----Original Message----- >> From: whatwg-bounces at lists.whatwg.org >> [mailto:whatwg-bounces at lists.whatwg.org] On Behalf Of Nicholas Zakas >> Sent: Friday, December 11, 2009 10:15 AM >> To: Simon Pieters; Anne van Kesteren; Aryeh Gregor >> Cc: whatwg at lists.whatwg.org >> Subject: Re: [whatwg] Inconsistent behavior for empty-string URLs >> >> I agree, automatic downloads are the real issue. <a href=""> is fine >> because a user must initiate the action (and thus generate a "real" >> pageview). >> >> I'd think that the behavior should be the same in CSS and SVG for >> resources that are automatically downloaded. >> >> -Nicholas >> >> ______________________________________________ >> Commander Lock: "Damnit Morpheus, not everyone believes what you >> believe!" >> Morpheus: "My beliefs do not require them to." >> >> -----Original Message----- >> From: Simon Pieters [mailto:simonp at opera.com] >> Sent: Thursday, December 10, 2009 10:57 AM >> To: Nicholas Zakas; Anne van Kesteren; Aryeh Gregor >> Cc: whatwg at lists.whatwg.org >> Subject: Re: [whatwg] Inconsistent behavior for empty-string URLs >> >> On Thu, 10 Dec 2009 19:22:43 +0100, Nicholas Zakas >> <nzakas at yahoo-inc.com> >> wrote: >> >> I'd be happy to make the compromise that this applies to markup but >>> >> not >> >>> to JavaScript APIs. >>> >> >> I think it shouldn't apply to markup that doesn't download things >> automatically; in particular <a href=""> should work. >> >> What about URLs in CSS and SVG? >> >> -- >> Simon Pieters >> Opera Software >> > > -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: <http://lists.whatwg.org/pipermail/whatwg-whatwg.org/attachments/20091216/76a561f1/attachment.htm>
Received on Tuesday, 15 December 2009 03:16:09 UTC