- From: Aryeh Gregor <Simetrical+w3c@gmail.com>
- Date: Tue, 15 Dec 2009 09:55:03 -0500
On Tue, Dec 15, 2009 at 6:16 AM, James May <whatwg at fowlsmurf.net> wrote: > If this change is made, what is the correct (explicit) way to refer to the > current URL? "." ? No, that will return the file in the current directory named ".". This might be the current directory itself. You would have to say "foo.html" or such. This shouldn't be a big deal, given how crazy you'd have to be to use the same URL for an HTML file and an image (or whatever). > In terms of web compat, I do recall a web picture gallery package that > returned a html information page with a self reference to show the actual > image. How did that work? It used a script that sniffed referers or something crazy like that?
Received on Tuesday, 15 December 2009 06:55:03 UTC