- From: Maciej Stachowiak <mjs@apple.com>
- Date: Tue, 15 Dec 2009 01:44:08 -0800
On Dec 14, 2009, at 11:08 AM, Nicholas Zakas wrote: > It seems that thusfar, Jonas from Mozilla is open to this change. Is > there anyone from Opera or WebKit that would like to chime in either > in > favor or opposition? I'd love to issue fewer useless loads, if sites don't actually rely on it. Does anyone have data on what, if any, compatibility impact this has? I can't imagine loading the base URL to be terribly useful in most cases, but perhaps there are wacky sites that do indeed rely on it. Regards, Maciej > > Thanks. > > -Nicholas > > ______________________________________________ > Commander Lock: "Damnit Morpheus, not everyone believes what you > believe!" > Morpheus: "My beliefs do not require them to." > > -----Original Message----- > From: whatwg-bounces at lists.whatwg.org > [mailto:whatwg-bounces at lists.whatwg.org] On Behalf Of Nicholas Zakas > Sent: Friday, December 11, 2009 10:15 AM > To: Simon Pieters; Anne van Kesteren; Aryeh Gregor > Cc: whatwg at lists.whatwg.org > Subject: Re: [whatwg] Inconsistent behavior for empty-string URLs > > I agree, automatic downloads are the real issue. <a href=""> is fine > because a user must initiate the action (and thus generate a "real" > pageview). > > I'd think that the behavior should be the same in CSS and SVG for > resources that are automatically downloaded. > > -Nicholas > > ______________________________________________ > Commander Lock: "Damnit Morpheus, not everyone believes what you > believe!" > Morpheus: "My beliefs do not require them to." > > -----Original Message----- > From: Simon Pieters [mailto:simonp at opera.com] > Sent: Thursday, December 10, 2009 10:57 AM > To: Nicholas Zakas; Anne van Kesteren; Aryeh Gregor > Cc: whatwg at lists.whatwg.org > Subject: Re: [whatwg] Inconsistent behavior for empty-string URLs > > On Thu, 10 Dec 2009 19:22:43 +0100, Nicholas Zakas > <nzakas at yahoo-inc.com> > wrote: > >> I'd be happy to make the compromise that this applies to markup but > not >> to JavaScript APIs. > > I think it shouldn't apply to markup that doesn't download things > automatically; in particular <a href=""> should work. > > What about URLs in CSS and SVG? > > -- > Simon Pieters > Opera Software
Received on Tuesday, 15 December 2009 01:44:08 UTC