W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > whatwg@whatwg.org > April 2009

[whatwg] native ordered dictionary data type in web storage draft

From: Maciej Stachowiak <mjs@apple.com>
Date: Tue, 14 Apr 2009 15:34:08 -0700
Message-ID: <E22A21CC-B248-47BA-9F05-DD81A94E4318@apple.com>

On Apr 14, 2009, at 1:03 PM, Patrick Mueller wrote:

> Aryeh Gregor wrote:
>> On Tue, Apr 14, 2009 at 1:54 PM, Patrick Mueller
>> <pmuellr at muellerware.org> wrote:
>>> Still doesn't seem like it makes sense to go ahead and build  
>>> dependencies on
>>> this (unfortunate, IMO) behavior.
>> Isn't HTML5 all about mandating and building dependencies on
>> unfortunate but entrenched behavior?
>
> web storage is not yet entrenched.  Unless you count Safari :-)
>
> This seems slightly different because it's making a dependency on  
> (unspec'd) JavaScript behavior.  Though I'd guess there are other  
> examples.

FWIW I believe the next version of the ECMAScript spec will specify  
the order of for..in enumeration.

Regards,
Maciej
Received on Tuesday, 14 April 2009 15:34:08 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Wednesday, 22 January 2020 16:59:11 UTC