- From: Patrick Mueller <pmuellr@muellerware.org>
- Date: Tue, 14 Apr 2009 19:00:00 -0400
Maciej Stachowiak wrote: > > On Apr 14, 2009, at 1:03 PM, Patrick Mueller wrote: > >> This seems slightly different because it's making a dependency on >> (unspec'd) JavaScript behavior. Though I'd guess there are other >> examples. > > FWIW I believe the next version of the ECMAScript spec will specify the > order of for..in enumeration. And that's another way to resolve the issue! :-) Checking some EcmaScript spec pages, like this one: http://wiki.ecmascript.org/doku.php?id=es3.1:es3.1_proposal_working_draft it appears that current versions of the spec have basically removed the description that the properties are unordered, without specifying that they're ordered, or how their ordered. But a step in the 'right' direction, I suppose. -- Patrick Mueller
Received on Tuesday, 14 April 2009 16:00:00 UTC