- From: Julian Reschke <julian.reschke@gmx.de>
- Date: Fri, 03 Apr 2009 07:52:41 +0200
Michael(tm) Smith wrote: > Masataka Yakura <myakura.web at gmail.com>, 2009-04-03 10:03 +0900: > >> I think the current plan is to point to BCP 47, since RFC 4646 is >> "soon" to be replaced by its successor [1]. >> >> [1] http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-html/2008Jan/0298.html > > And the general plan is to at some point(s) (e.g., before taking > the W3C version to Last call) do a thorough review and update of > all the references/citations to whatever the current versions are > that they should point to at that time. It's maybe not all that > useful to try to keep them up to date piecemeal along the way. But maybe it is. Checking references earlier catches problems earlier. BR, Julian
Received on Thursday, 2 April 2009 22:52:41 UTC