- From: Philipp Serafin <phil127@gmail.com>
- Date: Mon, 24 Nov 2008 18:46:51 +0100
Hello, I guess this is more a cosmetic remark, but I thought I'd bring this up anyway. I've noticed that the paragraph on the MetaExtensions wiki page[1] still lists the Microformats process as the only way to get a keyword approved. The equivalent paragraph on the RelExtensions page[2] had been changed to "... or must be defined by a W3C specification in the Candidate Recommendation or Recommendation state." some time ago. Shouldn't both paragraphs be identical, or are @rel and <meta> values really handled differently? Cheers, Philipp Serafin [1] http://wiki.whatwg.org/wiki/MetaExtensions [2] http://wiki.whatwg.org/wiki/RelExtensions
Received on Monday, 24 November 2008 09:46:51 UTC