W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > whatwg@whatwg.org > November 2008

[whatwg] MetaExtensions wiki page

From: Philipp Serafin <phil127@gmail.com>
Date: Mon, 24 Nov 2008 18:46:51 +0100
Message-ID: <492AE88B.5010502@gmail.com>

I guess this is more a cosmetic remark, but I thought I'd bring this up 
I've noticed that the paragraph on the MetaExtensions wiki page[1] still 
lists the Microformats process as the only way to get a keyword approved.
The equivalent paragraph on the RelExtensions page[2] had been changed 
to "... or must be defined by a W3C specification in the Candidate 
Recommendation or Recommendation state." some time ago.
Shouldn't both paragraphs be identical, or are @rel and <meta> values 
really handled differently?

Philipp Serafin

[1] http://wiki.whatwg.org/wiki/MetaExtensions
[2] http://wiki.whatwg.org/wiki/RelExtensions
Received on Monday, 24 November 2008 09:46:51 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Wednesday, 22 January 2020 16:59:07 UTC