W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > whatwg@whatwg.org > November 2008

[whatwg] MetaExtensions wiki page

From: Anne van Kesteren <annevk@opera.com>
Date: Thu, 27 Nov 2008 17:22:50 +0100
Message-ID: <op.ulac4cxw64w2qv@annevk-t60.oslo.opera.com>
On Mon, 24 Nov 2008 18:46:51 +0100, Philipp Serafin <phil127 at gmail.com>  
wrote:
> I guess this is more a cosmetic remark, but I thought I'd bring this up  
> anyway.
> I've noticed that the paragraph on the MetaExtensions wiki page[1] still  
> lists the Microformats process as the only way to get a keyword approved.
> The equivalent paragraph on the RelExtensions page[2] had been changed  
> to "... or must be defined by a W3C specification in the Candidate  
> Recommendation or Recommendation state." some time ago.
> Shouldn't both paragraphs be identical, or are @rel and <meta> values  
> really handled differently?

They should be identical, feel free to fix the page ;-)


> [1] http://wiki.whatwg.org/wiki/MetaExtensions
> [2] http://wiki.whatwg.org/wiki/RelExtensions


-- 
Anne van Kesteren
<http://annevankesteren.nl/>
<http://www.opera.com/>
Received on Thursday, 27 November 2008 08:22:50 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Wednesday, 22 January 2020 16:59:07 UTC