- From: Anne van Kesteren <annevk@opera.com>
- Date: Thu, 27 Nov 2008 17:22:50 +0100
On Mon, 24 Nov 2008 18:46:51 +0100, Philipp Serafin <phil127 at gmail.com> wrote: > I guess this is more a cosmetic remark, but I thought I'd bring this up > anyway. > I've noticed that the paragraph on the MetaExtensions wiki page[1] still > lists the Microformats process as the only way to get a keyword approved. > The equivalent paragraph on the RelExtensions page[2] had been changed > to "... or must be defined by a W3C specification in the Candidate > Recommendation or Recommendation state." some time ago. > Shouldn't both paragraphs be identical, or are @rel and <meta> values > really handled differently? They should be identical, feel free to fix the page ;-) > [1] http://wiki.whatwg.org/wiki/MetaExtensions > [2] http://wiki.whatwg.org/wiki/RelExtensions -- Anne van Kesteren <http://annevankesteren.nl/> <http://www.opera.com/>
Received on Thursday, 27 November 2008 08:22:50 UTC