W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > whatwg@whatwg.org > November 2008

[whatwg] Deprecating <small> , <b> ?

From: Smylers <Smylers@stripey.com>
Date: Mon, 24 Nov 2008 17:02:29 +0000
Message-ID: <20081124170229.GE19096@stripey.com>
Felix Miata writes:

> On 2008/11/24 16:19 (GMT) Smylers composed:
> > So I still think <small> works for denoting that something is of
> > smaller importance.
> I do too, but I don't believe less importance can be the only
> inference. One could simply want smaller text, without expecting that
> inference.

If you just want something to be smaller stylistically and there's
nothing special about that portion of the text then I think using
<small> for it would be as bad as using <h1> just to make text bigger;
CSS is a better choice.

> e.g., just because "fine print" legalese is called what it is doesn't
> doesn't necessarily make it unimportant or less important.

It's less important in the sense that it isn't the point of what the
author wants users to have conveyed to them; it's less important to the
message.  (Of course, to users any caveats in the small print may be
very important indeed!)

Received on Monday, 24 November 2008 09:02:29 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Wednesday, 22 January 2020 16:59:07 UTC