W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > whatwg@whatwg.org > August 2008

[whatwg] Scripted querying of <video> capabilities

From: timeless <timeless@gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 20 Aug 2008 15:29:24 +0300
Message-ID: <26b395e60808200529j23c114fex23eb0c49bdb1507d@mail.gmail.com>
On Wed, Aug 20, 2008 at 1:52 PM, Kristof Zelechovski
<giecrilj at stegny.2a.pl> wrote:
> Only the user that actually encounters a Web site deficiency should report
> it to the creator/owner (assuming they provided a reverse link).

> Otherwise such a report should be ignored as a supposition.

mass complaints work better.

> Why should browser vendors bother that some pages do not display correctly
> in other browsers?

for the good of the web.

> This is a validator's job, and a validator is an authoring tool.

i highly doubt this will work.

> That would mean supporting your competitor, wouldn't it?

can't we all get along and work for a better web?

but yes, it would mean helping your own engine on another profile
which might not support the same features.
Received on Wednesday, 20 August 2008 05:29:24 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Wednesday, 22 January 2020 16:59:04 UTC