- From: timeless <timeless@gmail.com>
- Date: Wed, 20 Aug 2008 15:29:24 +0300
On Wed, Aug 20, 2008 at 1:52 PM, Kristof Zelechovski <giecrilj at stegny.2a.pl> wrote: > Only the user that actually encounters a Web site deficiency should report > it to the creator/owner (assuming they provided a reverse link). > Otherwise such a report should be ignored as a supposition. mass complaints work better. > Why should browser vendors bother that some pages do not display correctly > in other browsers? for the good of the web. > This is a validator's job, and a validator is an authoring tool. i highly doubt this will work. > That would mean supporting your competitor, wouldn't it? can't we all get along and work for a better web? but yes, it would mean helping your own engine on another profile which might not support the same features.
Received on Wednesday, 20 August 2008 05:29:24 UTC