- From: Thomas Broyer <t.broyer@gmail.com>
- Date: Wed, 20 Aug 2008 14:24:24 +0200
2008/8/20 K?i?tof ?elechovski : > I am very disappointed. "onhashchange" intuitively means that the content > hash changes (which is more or less equivalent to modifying the content, of > course). onlocationhashchange? ...because it's fired when location.hash changes... (I have personally no problem with onhashchange)
Received on Wednesday, 20 August 2008 05:24:24 UTC